Home >> May 2023 Edition >> A Case In Point: 3D Printing In Space
A Case In Point: 3D Printing In Space
Nathanael “Nate” Baker, Senior Project Coordinator, CRP USA


Windform LX 3.0 assisted Portland State Aerospace Society’s OreSat0 smallsat achieve orbit

OreSat0 with solar modules and deployed tri-band turnstile antenna.
Courtesy PSAS

The 3D printed smallsat components discussed in the following article were manufactured by CRP USA for the Portland State Aerospace Society’s OreSat0 CubeSat, Oregon’s first satellite, that was deployed into LEO in March of 2021 and has been successfully operating since that date. A turnstile antenna assembly, a star tracker camera lens and sensor assembly, plus a battery assembly were all 3D printed using Windform LX 3.0. These assemblies all met the extreme vibration, outgassing and thermal performance requirements for LEO.

3D Printing In Space

The smallsat revolution is here — kilogram-class satellites, such as CubeSats, now offer functionality that was only available in larger, 100 to 1,000 kg class satellites. Recently, 3D printing has helped speed up this revolution, especially in universities. CubeSats have been  launched by dozens of countries, universities and companies around the world. The state of Oregon joined in recently, thanks to the Portland State Aerospace Society (PSAS) that built OreSat0, their own, artisanally hand-crafted, CubeSat system, currently in LEO. This achievement was possible, thanks to their use of Windform LX 3.0 composite material and industrial 3D printing for the smallsat’s most critical subsystems.

The OreSat Bus Project

The Portland  State Aerospace  Society is an open source, interdisciplinary, student aerospace project at Portland State University in Portland, Oregon, with collaborators at many other Oregon universities. They make sophisticated amateur rockets, small liquid fuel rocket engines and CubeSats. They currently have three satellite missions in the works and all rely on the fully open source OreSat bus, which they are offering as an inexpensive (for a satellite) “DIY ” platform for designing and building 1U through 3U CubeSats, paving the way for a solution to the “COTS vs. DIY ” dilemma.

The Portland State University Satellite Team: an interdisciplinary team of electrical engineers, mechanical engineers, computer science, math majors, and business students. Courtesy PSAS

“OreSat is our fully open source, modular, and re-usable CubeSat system designed for educational teams”, said PSAS members. “OreSat uses a card cage system, which allows cards to be reused on different missions from 1U to 3U CubeSats. Cards include everything you would expect aboard a CubeSat: an on-board computer with multi-band radios, a battery pack, a star tracker, a GPS receiver, and the beginnings of an attitude determination and control system (ADCS). Solar modules are mounted on the outside of the Aluminum frame, along with deployable omnidirectional antennas.”

OreSat0 was deployed into LEO on March 15th, 2021, and has been successfully operating since that date. OreSat0.5 is being readied for flight in October of 2023, and OreSat1 is scheduled for a deployment off the International Space Station (ISS) in early 2024.

The Project

The Portland State Aerospace Society is determined to develop better students through hands-on, interdisciplinary systems, engineering projects. Everything is designed, built, and tested by interdisciplinary student teams: mechanical engineers work on the structure, thermals and CAD. Electrical engineers design the cards made of PCBs (standard two and four layers boards), and computer science students program the Linux boxes and microcontrollers that run the CubeSat. PSAS members added, “There are very few open source satellites in the world, and ours is probably the most fully featured. We are currently collaborating with four other universities who are building satellites and ground stations based on our projects.”

Using Industrial 3D Printing + Windform

Before employing Selective Laser  Sintering and Windform LX 3.0 for manufacturing subsystems on  OreSat0, PSAS members used other technologies.

“We designed and manufactured the parts locally using extremely inexpensive FDM machines until we prototyped a design that worked. We then switched to SLS 3D printing, which worked extremely well. But we couldn’t find SLS parts that could stand the temperature extremes and that were vacuum rated to NASA and ESA outgassing standards. We were absolutely thrilled to find CRP Technology’s Windform LX 3.0 composite material and CRP USA. With Windform LX 3.0, we could design the parts for 3D printing, run quick turns to prototype on local printers, and then print our final engineering and flight units out of Windform. It absolutely changed the way we design all parts of our satellite thanks to its characteristics: Windform LX 3.0 can be used in space; it has extremely good material properties; it is extremely easy to work with; it is far superior to other 3D printing materials, including the other FDM, SLA, and SLS technologies that we’ve used.”

OreSat0 Systems Printed In Windform LX 3.0

Deployer for the tri-band turnstile antenna
The team selected Windform LX 3.0, a glass fiber, reinforced material from the Windform TOP-LINE range of composite materials for Powder Bed Fusion 3D printing process (Selective Laser Sintering). This allowed the PSAS team to use 3D printing processes on their critical subsystems, including their extremely reliable deployer for their tri-band turnstile antenna. The antenna has three separate antennas (UHF at 436.5 MHz, L band at 1.265 GHz, and L1 at 1.575 GHz), each with four elements; all 12 of these elements are deployed using nylon monofilament lines and only a single melt resistor. According to the team, “There was no way we would have been able to get the packing density of three bands with four elements each in anything other than a 3D printed, non-conductive process. We don’t know of any other satellite with this kind of antenna density.”

Star Tracker Lens  + Sensor Assembly
Using CRP’s Windform LX 3.0, PSAS members were able to mount their star tracker sensor and lens on a small daughterboard that kept the entire assembly to a single, 10 mm tall, card form factor.

Battery Pack
The battery pack needed to reliably hold 18650 cells through vibration testing while also providing thermal and electrical insulation from the rest of the satellite. Windform LX 3.0 allowed PSAS to make an extremely compact battery assembly that was still extremely rugged.

Testing Performed On Windform Parts

Before integration into the launch vehicle, OreSat0 (with 3D printed parts in Windform LX 3.0) was subjected to the following testing: Three axis 14 g random vibration, -40 to +80 °C thermal cycling, and vacuum cycling. Windform performed flawlessly for all of these tests. “And of course, continue to perform in low earth orbit for the last year” add PSAS members.

Advantages In Using Windform LX 3.0

The PSAS team recognized three crucial advantages through the use of Windform LX 3.0 and industrial 3D printing technology / Selective Laser Sintering process:

• The SLS process  provides robust  parts that can take environmental testing,  including 14 g of random vibration in all three axes and thermal vacuum cycling from -40 to +80 C.
• The Windform LX 3.0 provides us critical outgassing compliance that’s not available with any other SLS process.
• Windform LX 3.0 provides a non-conductive assembly  that can be safely used next to electrical components, such as PCBs, batteries,  and antennas.

According to the students, “Working with nanosatellites means extremely limited volume for all systems, so the ability to evolve and maximize the use of our space has been very beneficial. We pack a lot into a small space, and we can plan to use nearly every cubic millimeter when we can use 3D printed parts.

“Committing to the “final” design is always a tricky step - have we thought everything through?? Once we have the part in hand, it is much more difficult to make changes. Luckily, 3D printing is the fastest way to revise parts if something goes wrong.”

Author Nathanael “Nate” Baker is the Senior Project Coordinator for CRP USA.